Anna Friedman, CEO of Nasdaq, has spoken up with some interesting predictions at the 2019 World Economic Forum a few days ago. Some of these predictions are downright chilling in their implications: a major push forward for globalization and the mainstreaming of cryptocurrency to become a global currency used by everyone instead of cash.
Unless you’re an extreme masochist and sociopath, or somebody who could wield true authority in such a dystopian future, this is not a vision you would hope to see come true.
Such a scenario would allow a few individuals to control the financial freedom of literally everyone else. Fortunately this is extremely unlikely to occur for many reasons.
Most world leaders act against globalization
No matter what they may say, most politicians, even those with their noses deep in the corporate trough, are not in favor of a globalized world.
Supporting a One World Government would mean surrendering their grasp on power, as well as losing the lucrative income from taxing imports and restricting trade by imposing harsh tariffs against regimes they don’t favor.
Citizens won’t allow it
Even if political leaders embraced a New World Order, the people they govern would resist it with force. There is too much religious precedent and too many science fiction works depicting the end result of a globalized currency under central control for anyone in their right mind to allow their government overseers to make it a possibility.
If government authorities gain the power to restrict the freedom of individuals to participate in free trade, according to rules decided by themselves alone, then the very notion of freedom would be completely undermined (the opposite of what globalism promises) and there could be no way to prevent the violent and costly revolution that would rise up in consequence of the threat to global freedom.
It’s not needed
The strongest argument against the emergence of this global currency is that it’s not needed.
The dollar is already performing this function, as virtually all legitimate international trade, other than the trade in currencies, is conducted in US Dollars, except when it is trade between two members of the European Union, when the trade is more likely to involve an exchange of Euros for goods or services.
Cryptocurrency offers a simple and efficient way to conduct international trade, but it’s by no means necessary, and because of that, unlikely to become common.
It would be hugely expensive
To create a global currency would involve a lot of expense. If it were a paper and coin currency, who would put up the funds for the minting of it? Which countries would get the honor of minting it? How many fights would break out over the unfairness of one country getting more currency minting rights than another?
Then there’s cryptocurrency. Just because this has no physical form does not mean it can be produced without cost. It takes a lot of computer processing power to mine cryptocurrency, and that requires very large amounts of electrical power.
Quite simply there is not enough electricity being generated anywhere in the world to provide sufficient power to create sufficient units of cryptocurrency for each person in the world.
There are multiple cryptocurrencies
Can we really expect all these diverse cryptocurrencies to just meekly roll over and play dead if it is decided there should be a single global cryptocurrency (one ring to rule them all) when that notion is in direct opposition to the spirit upon which cryptocurrency was founded?
Notwithstanding that the owners of the currencies would lose fortunes as a result, all existing cryptocurrency owners favor decentralization and preach a message of resistance to authoritarian control. It’s like expecting swashbuckling pirates to bow before the King.
If there ever is a global currency, it won’t be crypto
No matter how many benefits of cryptocurrency we could list, there is just no way to convince the average man in the street that it’s going to be good for him to give up all his paper banknotes and coins, and put his faith in a computer generated and controlled currency.
Naysayers will cite things like electromagnetic pulses, solar flares, and even comets as good reasons to fear a system that is purely electronic. It’s a miracle that the people even allow their money to be stored in bank vaults, considering how ridiculously simple it is to wipe out (intentionally or otherwise) all evidence of their ownership of the cash.
Blockchain is actually safer than the current system, but it’s quite a bit more complicated to convince people of this fact. There’s also far more money invested in technologies to protect physical currency in comparison to the amount invested in the protection of any blockchain, so no matter how safe it may actually be, there is no way to persuade anyone that it’s safer than cash.
Cryptocurrency Still Has a Purpose
Just because crypto is not the great cash replacement that will allow the establishment of a cashless society doesn’t mean it has no place in our world. This currency can still be used as an investment medium and still has value. It can provide many benefits, especially with regard to powering blockchain expansion.
There hasn’t been the enthusiastic embrace of cryptocurrency that was expected to occur. By and large, the average consumer is still ignorant of cryptocurrency, and those who have heard of it tend to fear it.
Those who are intelligent enough to see the potential of cryptocurrency as an investment can make valuable gains if they choose wisely. But to treat cryptocurrency as a currency has no real advantage for the average person, especially since there are almost no legitimate retail outlets where you can spend it.